So, what do you think? Did Roger Ebert get it wrong, or was he justified in his criticism? Share your thoughts on this hilarious and thought-provoking topic!
Ebert noted that the movie's humor is often crude and juvenile, but he found it to be a funny and entertaining film. He particularly enjoyed the performances of Ferrell and Reilly, who he felt had great comedic timing. roger ebert step brothers
He called it "exhilarating," "sublimely ridiculous," and "a work of pure, uncut id." He placed it in the company of The Producers and Animal House . The review was not a guilty pleasure confession; it was a battle cry. To understand how a film about two men fighting over a drum set on a front lawn became, in Ebert’s eyes, a minor masterpiece, is to understand the very soul of his criticism. So, what do you think
: He cited scenes of physical violence between the adult-children—specifically the "living burial" and the "drum set" altercation—as exhausting rather than humorous. Ebert noted that the movie's humor is often
Years later, director Adam McKay revealed that he actually Ebert’s scathing review. McKay argued that Ebert had unintentionally captured the exact feeling the filmmakers wanted to evoke: the frustration of a society dealing with the "infantilization" of American men. According to Decider , McKay felt Ebert wrote the review from the perspective of Richard Jenkins' character, making the critique a meta-tribute to the film’s underlying themes. Contemporary Legacy The feel-bad comedy of the year! movie review - Roger Ebert
: Ebert noted the film's pervasive profanity was "excessive" and lacked the clever "comic strategy" found in other R-rated comedies.